The section rose to 72°F
The failure developed about a month after major sealed-system work.
The first suspicion was a leak after compressor and evaporator work. With no visible evaporator evidence, an oil restriction became the accepted branch; the thread did not preserve a completed purge or cooling result.
The thread did not state that the purge was completed or that cooling returned. A similar symptom can have a different cause on another appliance or model.
The failure developed about a month after major sealed-system work.
Opening the wall did not reveal the expected oil mark or visibly failed evaporator.
The accepted next action was to clear the restriction rather than repeat a leak assumption.
The technician's acceptance supports oil in the line as the diagnosis reached in the discussion. It does not establish a completed purge or a post-repair result.
On a similar recall, preserve pressures, temperatures, components replaced and any visible oil. A sealed-system technician should verify both restriction and leak branches before adding charge or replacing another component.