248 volts was recorded
The total reading confirmed a supply was present but did not show whether each leg and connection remained sound under the same path.
A 248-volt reading looked suspicious, but it did not identify the fault. The useful comparison was each line and the total at both the receptacle and the range connection.
A similar symptom can have a different cause on another appliance or model.
The total reading confirmed a supply was present but did not show whether each leg and connection remained sound under the same path.
Matching line-to-neutral and line-to-line readings across both points can expose a cord or connection loss.
The technician moved away from the initially suspected power-control board after inspecting the connection path.
The case supports a physical cord or connection problem as the leading cause of this F68 event. It does not document the exact damaged point or a final operational test, so the conclusion remains marked as accepted without an explicit repair outcome.
The 248-volt number by itself was not the diagnosis.
A qualified technician should record both supply legs and the total at the receptacle and at the range connection, then document heat damage, looseness or voltage loss in the cord path before evaluating the power-control board.